- •More than 1 in 10 trials reported outcomes inconsistent with those prespecified.
- •The majority of the inconsistencies favored statistically significant findings.
- •Single-center recruitment was associated with inconsistent outcome reporting.
Methods and Results
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Journal of Cardiac Failure
- Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias.PLoS O. ne 2008; 3: e3081https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003081
- Of consents and CONSORTS: reporting ethics, law, and human rights in RCTs involving monitored overdose of healthy volunteers pre and post the “consort” guidelines.J Toxicol. 2003; 41: 93-99https://doi.org/10.1081/CLT-120019120
- Undisclosed changes in outcomes in randomized controlled trials: an observational study.Ann Fam Med. 2009; 7: 542-546https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1017
- CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.BMJ (Clin Res). 2010; 340: c869https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c869
- Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.JAMA. 2004; 292: 1363-1364https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.11.1363
- Discrepancies between randomized controlled trial registry entries and content of corresponding manuscripts reported in anesthesiology journals.Anesth Analges. 2015; 121: 1030-1033https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000824
- Surgical trials and trial registers: a cross-sectional study of randomized controlled trials published in journals requiring trial registration in the author instructions.Trials. 2013; 14: 407https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-407
- Quality of registration for clinical trials published in emergency medicine journals.Ann Emerg Med. 2012; 60 (e1): 458-464https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.02.005
- Prospective registration and outcome-reporting bias in randomized controlled trials of eczema treatments: a systematic review.J Invest Dermatol. 2012; 132: 2727-2734https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2012.231
- Association of trial registration with the results and conclusions of published trials of new oncology drugs.Trials. 2009; 10: 116https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-116
- Registration status and outcome reporting of trials published in core headache medicine journals.Neurology. 2015; 85: 1789-1794https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002127
- Systematic review: outcome reporting bias is a problem in high impact factor neurology journals.Plos One. 2017; 12 (Janigro D, ed)e0180986https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180986
- Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials.JAMA. 2009; 302: 977-984https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1242
- Outcome reporting bias in randomized-controlled trials investigating antipsychotic drugs.Transl Psych. 2017; 7: e1232https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2017.203
- The COMET Handbook: version 1.0.Trials. 2017; 18: 1-50https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4
ICTRP Search Portal. Accessed February 26, 2021. https://apps.who.int/trialsearch/
ANZCTR. Accessed February 26, 2021. http://www.anzctr.org.au/TrialSearch.aspx
Home - ClinicalTrials.gov. Accessed February 26, 2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/
ISRCTN Registry. Accessed February 26, 2021. https://www.isrctn.com/
Clinical Trials Register. Accessed March 2, 2021. https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search
- Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.JAMA. 2004; 291: 2457-2465https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.20.2457
- Use of trial register information during the peer review process.PLoS One. 2013; 8: e59910https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059910
- Clinical trial data for all drugs in current use.BMJ (Online). 2012; 345: e7304https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e7304
- Strategies for dealing with fraud in clinical trials.Int J Clin Oncol. 2015; 21: 22-27https://doi.org/10.1007/S10147-015-0876-6
Spence O, Hong K, Uba RO, Doshi P. Availability of study protocols for randomized trials published in high-impact medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis. Clin Trials 2019;17:99–105. https://doi.org/101177/1740774519868310.
- Reporting of clinical trials: a review of research funders’ guidelines.Trials. 2008; 9: 66https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-66
- Time to ensure that clinical trial appropriate results are actually published.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014; 70: 491-493https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-013-1635-0
- Prospective clinical trial registration: not sufficient, but always necessary.Anaesthesia. 2018; 73: 538-541https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14189
- Comparison of registered and reported outcomes in randomized clinical trials published in anesthesiology journals.Anesthes Analges. 2017; 125: 1292-1300https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002272
- Funding of cardiovascular research in the USA.Eur Heart J. 2018; 39: 3629-3631https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy638