Advertisement

Physician Radiation Exposure During Endomyocardial Biopsy and Right Heart Catheterization

      Highlights

      • Right heart catheterizations (RHC) and endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) are frequently performed using the internal jugular (IJ) approach.
      • The physician radiation exposure during RHC with EMB using the IJ approach is similar to that of coronary angiography.
      • Education regarding this occupational risk to cardiologists performing RHC and EMB is necessary.

      ABSTRACT

      Background

      Cardiologists performing coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at risk of health problems related to chronic occupational radiation exposure. Unlike during CA and PCI, physician radiation exposure during right heart catheterization (RHC) and endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) has not been adequately studied. The objective of this study was to assess physicians’ radiation doses during RHC with and without EMB and compare them to those of CA and PCI.

      Methods

      Procedural head-level physician radiation doses were collected by real-time dosimeters. Radiation-dose metrics (fluoroscopy time, air kerma [AK] and dose area product [DAP]), and physician-level radiation doses were compared among RHC, RHC with EMB, CA, and PCI.

      Results

      Included in the study were 351 cardiac catheterization procedures. Of these, 36 (10.3%) were RHC, 42 (12%) RHC with EMB, 156 (44.4%) CA, and 117 (33.3%) PCI. RHC with EMB and CA had similar fluoroscopy time. AK and DAP were progressively higher for RHC, RHC with EMB, CA, and PCI. Head-level physician radiation doses were similar for RHC with EMB vs CA (P = 0.07). When physicians’ radiation doses were normalized to DAP, RHC and RHC with EMB had the highest doses.

      Conclusion

      Physicians’ head-level radiation doses during RHC with EMB were similar to those of CA. After normalizing to DAP, RHC and RHC with EMB were associated with significantly higher physician radiation doses than CA or PCI. These observations suggest that additional protective measures should be undertaken to decrease physicians’ radiation exposure during RHC and, in particular, RHC with EMB.

      Graphical abstract

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Cardiac Failure
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Elmaraezy A
        • Ebraheem Morra M
        • Tarek Mohammed A
        • et al.
        Risk of cataract among interventional cardiologists and catheterization lab staff: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Cath Cardiovasc Interven. 2017; 90: 1-9
        • Andreassi MG
        • Piccaluga E
        • Gargani L
        • et al.
        Subclinical carotid atherosclerosis and early vascular aging from long-term low-dose ionizing radiation exposure: a genetic, telomere, and vascular ultrasound study in cardiac catheterization laboratory staff.
        JACC Cardiovasc Interven. 2015; 8: 616-627
        • Roguin A
        • Goldstein J
        • Bar O
        • Goldstein JA.
        Brain and neck tumors among physicians performing interventional procedures.
        Am J Cardiol. 2013; 111: 1368-1372
        • Madder RD
        • VanOosterhout S
        • Mulder A
        • et al.
        Patient body mass index and physician radiation dose during coronary angiography.
        Circulat Cardiovasc Interven. 2019; 12e006823
        • Salcido-Rios J
        • McNamara DA
        • VanOosterhout S
        • et al.
        Suspended lead suit and physician radiation doses during coronary angiography.
        Cath Cardiovasc Interven. 2022; 99: 981-988
        • Biso SMR
        • Vidovich MI.
        Radiation protection in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
        J Thor Dis. 2020; 12: 1648-1655
        • Madder RD
        • VanOosterhout S
        • Mulder A
        • et al.
        Impact of robotics and a suspended lead suit on physician radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary intervention.
        Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017; 18: 190-196
        • Madder RD
        • LaCombe A
        • VanOosterhout S
        • et al.
        Radiation exposure among scrub technologists and nurse circulators during cardiac catheterization: the impact of accessory lead shields.
        JACC Cardiovasc Interven. 2018; 11: 206-212
        • Borghini A
        • Vecoli C
        • Piccaluga E
        • Guagliumi G
        • Picano E
        • Andreassi MG.
        Increased mitochondrial DNA4977-bp deletion in catheterization laboratory workers with long-term low-dose exposure to ionizing radiation.
        Eur J PreventcCardiol. 2019; 26: 976-984
        • Andreassi MG
        • Cioppa A
        • Botto N
        • et al.
        Somatic DNA damage in interventional cardiologists: a case-control study.
        FASEB J. 2005; 19: 998-999
        • El-Sayed T
        • Patel AS
        • Cho JS
        • et al.
        Radiation-induced DNA damage in operators performing endovascular aortic repair.
        Circulation. 2017; 136: 2406-2416
        • Kuon E
        • Weitmann K
        • Hoffmann W
        • et al.
        Role of experience, leadership and individual protection in the cath lab: a multicenter questionnaire and workshop on radiation safety.
        RoFo. 2015; 187: 899-905
        • Balter S.
        Radiation safety in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: operational radiation safety.
        Cathe Cardiovasc Interven. 1999; 47: 347-353
        • Tarighatnia A
        • Farajollahi AR
        • Mohammadalian AH
        • et al.
        Radiation exposure levels according to vascular access sites during PCI: a prospective controlled study.
        Herz. 2019; 44: 330-335
        • Jia Q
        • Chen Z
        • Jiang X
        • et al.
        Operator radiation and the efficacy of ceiling-suspended lead screen shielding during coronary angiography: an anthropomorphic phantom study using real-time dosimeters.
        Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 42077
        • McNamara DA
        • Chopra R
        • Decker JM
        • et al.
        Comparison of radiation exposure among interventional echocardiographers, interventional cardiologists, and sonographers during percutaneous structural heart interventions.
        JAMA netw open. 2022; 5e2220597
        • Kim KP
        • Miller DL
        • Balter S
        • et al.
        Occupational radiation doses to operators performing cardiac catheterization procedures.
        Health Physics. 2008; 94: 211-227
        • Sutton NJ
        • Lamour J
        • Gellis LA
        • Pass RH.
        Pediatric patient radiation dosage during endomyocardial biopsies and right heart catheterization using a standard "ALARA" radiation reduction protocol in the modern fluoroscopic era.
        Cath Cardiovas Interven. 2014; 83: 80-83
        • Fiorilli PN
        • Kobayashi T
        • Giri J
        • Hirshfeld Jr, JW
        Strategies for radiation exposure-sparing in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures.
        Cath Cardiovasc Intervent. 2020; 95: 118-127
        • Miller LW
        • Labovitz AJ
        • McBride LA
        • Pennington DG
        • Kanter K.
        Echocardiography-guided endomyocardial biopsy: a 5-year experience.
        Circulation. 1988; 78 (99–102)