Introduction: Heart failure preserved with ejection fraction (HFpEF) constitutes half of HF hospitalizations
today, however there is little prospective data to guide management of acute decompensated
heart failure (ADHF) in this population. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that low-dose dopamine (DA) may enhance decongestion while preserving
renal function in HFpEF patients in ADHF. Methods: In a prospective, randomized trial, we assigned 90 HFpEF patients presenting with
ADHF to receive one of four treatments within 24 hours of hospitalization: (1) intravenous
furosemide administered every 12 hrs (IF), (2) continuous infusion furosemide (CF);
(3) intermittent bolus furosemide with low-dose DA (3 mcg/kg/min, IF + DA); (4) continuous
infusion furosemide with low-dose DA (CF + DA). The treatment duration was 72 hours.
The recommended diuretic dosing was at least 2.0 times the prior oral dose. The primary
endpoint was percent change in creatinine from baseline to 72 hours. Secondary endpoints
included worsening renal function (WRF), defined as rise in creatinine by 0.3 mg/dL
at 72 hrs, and volume of diuresis at 72 hrs. Linear regression and logistic regression
analyses were performed for the outcomes of interest, with tests for interaction between
diuretic and DA strategies. Results: The overall cohort was characterized by: mean age 66 years (SD ±13), 68% women, 62%
black, with mean creatinine 1.3 mg/dL (IQR 0.9–1.7). In comparing the IF v. CF treatment
arms (Table 1), CF was associated with higher % increase creatinine (11.15; 95% CI: 0.92, 21.37)
and higher OR for development of WRF (OR 4.32; 95% CI: 1.26, 14.74), in regression
analyses, with no difference in volume of diuresis. In comparing the DA v. no DA treatment
arms, there were no significant differences in % change creatinine or development
of WRF, however the DA arm was associated with greater volume of diuresis (988 mL,
95% CI: 240 mL, 1736 mL). No significant interaction was seen between diuretic strategy
and DA (P > .7). Conclusion: In HFpEF patients with ADHF, CF was associated with higher % increase creatinine
and higher odds of WRF in regression models, without a significant difference in volume
of diuresis. DA had no significant impact on renal function and was associated with
greater volume of diuresis at 72 hrs. Low dose DA may be considered in the management
of acute HFpEF to augment diuresis, whereas CF should be avoided in these patients.
Table 1Renal Function and Diuresis Outcomes by Diuretic Strategy and Vasopressor Strategy
Diuretic Strategy | Intermittent Furosemide | Continuous Furosemide | P value |
---|---|---|---|
% Increase in Cr (Linear Regression) |
0.0 (REF) | 11.15 (0.92, 21.37) |
.03 |
WRF (Creat ↑ 0.3) (OR, Logistic Regression) |
1.0 (REF) | 4.32 (1.26, 14.74) |
.02 |
Volume of Diuresis (Linear Regression) |
0.0 (REF) | 534.70 (−278.79, 1348.19) |
.19 |
Dopamine Strategy | No Dopamine | Dopamine | P value |
% Increase in Cr (Linear Regression) |
0.0 (REF) | 4.80 (−5.15, 14.75) |
.34 |
WRF (Creat ↑ 0.3) (OR, Logistic Regression) |
1.0 (REF | 1.09 (0.38, 3.10) | .87 |
Volume of Diuresis (Linear Regression) |
0.00 (REF) | 988.07 (240.13, 1736.01) |
.01 |
Model adjusted for age, race, gender, current smoking, hypertension, diabetes, atrial
fibrillation, baseline eGFR, change in SBP over 72 hours, change in heart rate over
72 hours.
WRF = worsening renal function; OR = Odds ratio.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Cardiac FailureAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect