Welcome to the JCF's mini-focus issue on Patient Engagement. That raises an obvious
question, though—what exactly is Patient Engagement? I recently asked five different
colleagues this question, and as you may imagine, I got five somewhat different answers,
including self-care, patient activation, better access to care, shared decision-making,
and of course, Meaningful Use Criteria!
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Cardiac FailureAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- White Paper: A new definition of patient engagement: What is engagement and why is it important.(Washington DC)2010
- Guide to Patient and Family Engagement in Hospital Quality and Safety.(Content last reviewed February; Rockville, MD; Available at)http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/systems/hospital/engagingfamilies/index.htmlDate: 2017Date accessed: September 19, 2017
- Health Policy Brief: Patient Engagement.(February 14)2013
- Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.The National Academies Press., Washington, DC2001
- Patient engagement in the inpatient setting: a systematic review.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014; 21: 742-750
- The blockbuster drug of the century: An engaged patient.(Available at)http://healthstandards.com/blog/2012/08/28/drug-of-the-century/Date accessed: September 19, 2017
- Barriers to goals of care discussions with patients who have advanced heart failure: results of a multi-centre survey of hospital-based cardiology clinicians.J Card Fail. 2017; 23: 786-793
- End-of-life discussions in patients with heart failure.J Card Fail. 2017; 23: 821-825
- Patient activation among urban hospitalized patients with heart failure.J Card Fail. 2017; 23: 817-820
- Implementation of real-time assessment of patient-reported outcomes in a heart failure clinic: a feasibility study.J Card Fail. 2017; 23: 813-816
- Weblogs: a complex data source for qualitative research.J Card Fail. 2017; 23: 826-827
- Social media platforms and heart failure.J Card Fail. 2017; 23: 809-812
- Accuracy of self-reported heart failure. The atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study.J Card Fail. 2017; 23: 802-808
- Evidence of cognitive bias in decision making around implantable-cardioverter defibrillators: a qualitative framework analysis.J Card Fail. 2017; 23: 794-799
- The ICD and shared decision making: nothing is ever easy.J Card Fail. 2017; 23: 800-801
Article info
Publication history
Published online: October 03, 2017
Identification
Copyright
© 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
