Background: Hospitalization of patients with acute heart failure (AHF) in Japan is extremely
longer than that in Western countries. Longer stay is often due to social background
rather than patient systemic status. Additionally, Japanese cardiologists tend to
try to achieve complete restoration of decompensated HF to avoid rehospitalization
and improve mortality after discharge. We aimed to evaluate the impact of hospital
duration on clinical prognosis after discharge in patients with AHF. Methods and Results: This study included 1,070 consecutive patients who were urgently hospitalized due
to AHF and discharged alive between 2013 and 2017. They were divided into 2 groups
depending on a median hospital stay of enrolled patients (18.5 days); the Longer stay
(n = 533) and Shorter stay group (n = 539). The primary endpoint was a combination
of death from any cause and readmission due to worsening of HF. The Longer group had
significantly higher BNP, lower cardiac function and poorer renal function, and were
treated with higher dose of daily furosemide than Shorter group at baseline. After
propensity score matching, during 275 days of median follow-up period, Kaplan-Meier
analysis did not show a significant difference in the incidence of primary endpoint
between the Shorter and Longer stay groups (n = 239 e.a., Log-rank: P = .97). Conclusions: Longer hospital stay did not achieve better clinical outcomes in patients with AHF
after discharge alive.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Cardiac FailureAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect