Race and the Natural History of Chronic Heart Failure: A Propensity-Matched Study
Abstract
Background
Racial differences in the epidemiology and outcomes of heart failure are well known. However, the association of race with the natural history of heart failure has not been previously studied in a propensity-matched population of chronic heart failure in which all measured baseline patient characteristics are well-balanced between the races.
Methods and Results
Of the 7788 patients with chronic systolic and diastolic heart failure in the Digitalis Investigation Group trial, 1128 were nonwhites. Propensity scores for being nonwhite were calculated for each patient and were used to match 1018 pairs of white and nonwhite patients. Matched Cox regression analyses were used to estimate associations of race with outcomes during 38 months of median follow-up. All-cause mortality occurred in 34% (rate, 1180/10000 person-years) of whites and 33% (rate, 1130/10000 person-years) of nonwhite patients (hazard ratio when nonwhite patients were compared with whites, 0.95, 95% confidence interval, 0.80–1.14; P = .593). All-cause hospitalization occurred in 63% (rate, 3616/10000 person-years) of whites and 65% (rate, 3877/10000 person-years) of nonwhite patients (hazard ratio, 1.03, 95% confidence interval, 0.90–1.18; P = .701). Respective hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for other outcomes were: 0.95 (0.75–1.12) for cardiovascular mortality, 0.82 (0.60–1.11) for heart failure mortality, 1.05 (0.91–1.22) for cardiovascular hospitalization, and 1.17 (0.98–1.39) for heart failure hospitalization.
Conclusions
In a propensity-matched population of heart failure patients where whites and nonwhites were balanced in all measured baseline characteristics, there were no racial differences in major natural history end points.
Key Words: Heart failure, race, natural history, propensity scores
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Dr. Ahmed is supported by the National Institutes of Health through grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (5-R01-HL085561-02 and P50-HL077100), and a generous gift form Ms. Jean B. Morris of Birmingham, AL.
“The Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG) study was conducted and supported by the NHLBI in collaboration with the DIG Investigators. This article was prepared using a limited access dataset obtained by the NHLBI and does not necessarily reflect the opinions or views of the DIG Study or the NHLBI.”
PII: S1071-9164(08)00063-8
doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2008.02.004
© 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
