Journal of Cardiac Failure
Volume 13, Issue 8 , Pages 649-655, October 2007

Impact of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction: A Clinical and Echocardiographic Study

  • Jeffrey W.H. Fung, FRCP

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Jeffrey W.H. Fung, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
  • ,
  • John E. Sanderson, MD, FACC

      Affiliations

    • The Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Division of Medical Sciences, The Medical School, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Gabriel W.K. Yip, MD, FACC

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
  • ,
  • Qing Zhang, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
  • ,
  • Cheuk M. Yu, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

Received 18 November 2006; received in revised form 25 April 2007; accepted 26 April 2007.

Abstract 

Background

The clinical significance of atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure with normal ejection fraction (HFNEF) remains undetermined.

Methods and Results

We compared the clinical and echocardiographic characteristics among 238 patients hospitalized for HF. Using the cutoff of left ventricular EF of 50%, there were 146 patients with HFNEF (AF = 42) and 92 with systolic HF (AF = 30). When compared among HFNEF, the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (2.61 ± 0.51 versus 2.21 ± 0.46; P < .05), 6-minute walk distance (279.7 ± 66.0 versus 338.0 ± 86.1 m; P < .01), quality of life score (26.1 ± 14.3 versus 19.5 ± 10.3; P < .05), and previous HF hospitalization were significantly worse in the AF group. These variables were significantly better in HFNEF than systolic HF with sinus rhythm, but the differences were not detected among those with AF. Patients with HFNEF and AF were associated with more severe diastolic dysfunction when compared to sinus rhythm. With a median follow-up of 10.5 months, the proportion of HFNEF patients in AF with recurrent HF hospitalization or death was significantly higher than those in sinus rhythm (28.6% versus 10.6%; P < .01). Both AF and restrictive diastolic dysfunction were independent predictors of HF hospitalization or death in HFNEF.

Conclusion

Patients with HFNEF and AF were associated with more severe diastolic dysfunction and worse clinical outcomes than those in sinus rhythm.

Key Words: Atrial fibrillation, heart failure with normal ejection fraction, heart failure hospitalization, echocardiography

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1071-9164(07)00158-3

doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2007.04.014

Journal of Cardiac Failure
Volume 13, Issue 8 , Pages 649-655, October 2007