VE/VCO2 Slope in Older Heart Failure Patients With Normal Versus Reduced Ejection Fraction Compared With Age-Matched Healthy Controls
Background
Oxygen consumption (VO2) has previously been used for prognosis and risk stratification in patients with heart failure. More recent research has introduced VE/VCO2 slope as a prognostic measure. Risk of mortality is thought to increase when VE/VCO2 slope values are greater than 34. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to cross-sectionally examine VE/VCO2 slope in systolic heart failure (SHF) and diastolic heart failure (DHF) as well as age-matched healthy controls.
Methods and Results
Maximal graded exercise tests were conducted on 147 patients (59 DHF, 60 SHF, and 28 controls) using a bicycle ergometer. Breath-by-breath expired gas analysis was performed using a commercially available system with on-line computer calculations. VE/VCO2 slope was calculated from a regression line of minute ventilation and carbon dioxide production. One-way analysis of covariance with a Benferroni post hoc test and Pearson correlations were used for statistical analysis. VE/VCO2 slope was significantly higher in SHF when compared to both DHF (37 ± 8 vs. 34 ± 7, P = .03) and controls (37 ± 8 vs. 32 ± 5, P = .002). No significant difference was observed between DHF and healthy controls (34 ± 7 vs. 32 ± 5, P = .52). Additional analysis resulted in significant correlations between VO2 and VE/VCO2 slope in systolic heart failure patients (r = −0.40, P = .002); however, there was no significant relationships in diastolic heart failure patients (r = −0.09, P = .49) or in controls (r = 0.13, P = .50).
Conclusions
VE/VCO2 slope is significantly higher in patients with SHF compared with DHF and healthy controls.
Key Words: Heart failure, VE/VCO2 slope
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Supported by N.I.H. Grants AG18915 and AG12257; The Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center of Wake Forest University N.I.H. Grant P60AG10484; The Research and Development Fund of The Center for Medical Ultrasound, and the General Clinical Research Center (grant #MO1RR07122) of the Wake Forest University School of Medicine of Wake Forest University.
PII: S1071-9164(06)01297-8
doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2006.12.005
© 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
