Journal of Cardiac Failure
Volume 12, Issue 7 , Pages 540-545, September 2006

Socioeconomic Factors as Predictors of Incident Heart Failure

  • Erik Ingelsson, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • From the Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Erik Ingelsson, MD, PhD, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Section of Geriatrics, Uppsala University Uppsala Science Park, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
  • ,
  • Lars Lind, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
    • Astra Zeneca R&D, Mölndal, Sweden
  • ,
  • Johan Ärnlöv, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • From the Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • ,
  • Johan Sundström, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • From the Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
    • Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Received 9 March 2006; received in revised form 24 May 2006; accepted 25 May 2006.

Uppsala, Sweden; Mölndal, Sweden

Abstract 

Background

Studies of socioeconomic factors as predictors of heart failure (HF) are few and have given opposing results. Further, it is unknown if these factors predict incident HF independently of myocardial infarction and other established risk factors for HF.

Methods and Results

In a community-based cohort of 2314 middle-age men free from HF, valvular disease, and previous myocardial infarction at baseline, socioeconomic factors were examined as predictors for HF using Cox proportional hazards analyses. In multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for established risk factors for HF (hypertension, diabetes, electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy, smoking, serum cholesterol, and interim myocardial infarction), low occupational classification (hazard ratio [HR] 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–2.35 for low vs. high occupational classification), low education level (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.07–3.68 for elementary school vs. college exam) and being unmarried (HR 1.44, 95% CI 0.99–2.10 for being unmarried vs. being married) increased the risk of HF.

Conclusion

High occupational classification and high education level decreased, and being unmarried increased, the risk of subsequent HF in middle-age men, via mechanisms largely independent of established risk factors for HF, including an interim myocardial infarction. Further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms behind these associations.

Key Words: Occupational classification, education level, marital status, epidemiology

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by the Primary Health Care in Uppsala County, Swedish Heart Lung Foundation (Hjärt-Lungfonden) and Thuréus Foundation. The funding source had no involvement in the work with the article.

PII: S1071-9164(06)00275-2

doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2006.05.010

Journal of Cardiac Failure
Volume 12, Issue 7 , Pages 540-545, September 2006